Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Session resumption improvements #2099

Open
7 tasks
maddeleine opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
7 tasks

Session resumption improvements #2099

maddeleine opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority/low Rank 4 size/medium

Comments

@maddeleine
Copy link
Contributor

maddeleine commented Jan 19, 2024

Security issue notifications

If you discover a potential security issue in s2n-quic we ask that you notify
AWS Security via our vulnerability reporting page. Please do not create a public github issue.

Problem:

There are a few ways that we can improve the initial session resumption feature to make it more user-friendly:

  • Enabling resumption when s2n-quic is using rustls
  • Adding an event that indicates
    • when session tickets are received post-handshake on the client, as this varies per quic implementation.
    • when a session ticket is sent for a handshake on the client
    • when a session ticket is accepted/rejected on the client
    • when a session ticket is sent by the server
    • when a session ticket is accepted/rejected on the server
@maddeleine maddeleine added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 19, 2024
@stranzhay
Copy link

hi @maddeleine just wondering about timeline for s2n-quic rustls resumption, days/weeks/months. we are currently trying to reconfigure our setup to use s2n-tls instead of the rustls its currently using but with ed25519 keys. s2n-tls does not support ed25519 atm so trying to judge where our efforts should be at this time.

@maddeleine
Copy link
Contributor Author

We don't have a timeline for resumption with rustls in s2n-quic yet. It's definitely something we want to add, but not something we have on our roadmap right now.

@stranzhay
Copy link

ok thank you for quick response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority/low Rank 4 size/medium
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants