Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Digital Certificate creation #140

Closed

Conversation

AndreZiviani
Copy link
Contributor

@AndreZiviani AndreZiviani commented Mar 10, 2024

API return a comma separated list of subject names, we need to split it to a list, maybe doing on the SDK would be better. Also order shouldn't matter so use Set instead

Fixes:

╷
│ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply
│ 
│ When applying changes to azion_digital_certificate.test, provider "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/aziontech/azion\"]" produced
│ an unexpected new value: .certificate_result: inconsistent values for sensitive attribute.
│ 
│ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's own issue tracker.
╵

@AndreZiviani AndreZiviani requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2024 20:17
@AndreZiviani
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@AndreZiviani AndreZiviani force-pushed the fix-digitalcertificate branch from a5429d1 to 6ebcaad Compare March 10, 2024 20:22
@AndreZiviani AndreZiviani force-pushed the fix-digitalcertificate branch from 6ebcaad to 8f9c47c Compare March 11, 2024 13:53
@maxwelbm
Copy link
Contributor

maxwelbm commented Oct 14, 2024

@AndreZiviani Error occurs due to incorrect use of the structure that does not support the subject_name field.

produced an unexpected new value: .certificate_result:
│ inconsistent values for sensitive attribute.

https://registry.terraform.io/providers/aziontech/azion/latest/docs/resources/digital_certificate

@maxwelbm maxwelbm closed this Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants