You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
They are similar to RFC4122's time-based (version 1) UUIDs but the timestamp's bits are stored in standard byte order which make the UUIDs sortable using lexicographic order.
There exists a proposal for "Version 6" UUIDs.
They are similar to RFC4122's time-based (version 1) UUIDs but the timestamp's bits are stored in standard byte order which make the UUIDs sortable using lexicographic order.
Should we wait for the proposal to be accepted before implementing it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: