Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a CIIP program admin, I want to see always up-to-date wording on the landing page, so that I don't have to request a change every year #2086

Open
pbastia opened this issue May 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
attn: Business Area Blocked issue, Business area Backlog Refinement Issues to look at during backlog refinement. User Story A User Story issue type

Comments

@pbastia
Copy link
Contributor

pbastia commented May 2, 2022

Description:

We could make the message depending on:

  • whether a reporting year is configured in the system for the current year
  • and whether that reporting year's application cycle is open

Acceptance Criteria:

Given I am a CIIP administrator
When there is a reporting year configured for the current year
And that reporting year is closed
Then I can see on the landing page:

In 'CURRENT YEAR', CIIP applications will be accepted from 'DATE OPEN' to 'DATE CLOSE'. Outside of this period, you may still log in to view your submitted CIIP applications and submit any changes requested by the Climate Action Secretariat.

Given I am a CIIP administrator
When there is a reporting year configured for the current year
And that reporting year is open
Then I can see on the landing page:

Operators must submit a CIIP application form by 'APPLICATION DEADLINE'. As part of the application, information about the operation’s energy use, emissions, and production is required.

Given I am a CIIP administrator
When there is no reporting year configured for the current year
Then I can see on the landing page:

Wording TBD

  • [Other AC]
  • [Other AC]
  • [Other AC]
  • Meets the DOD
@pbastia pbastia added attn: Business Area Blocked issue, Business area Backlog Refinement Issues to look at during backlog refinement. User Story A User Story issue type labels May 2, 2022
@matthieu-foucault
Copy link
Contributor

@pbastia should we icebox this, as this won't be needed until next year?

@pbastia
Copy link
Contributor Author

pbastia commented May 3, 2022

most definitely

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
attn: Business Area Blocked issue, Business area Backlog Refinement Issues to look at during backlog refinement. User Story A User Story issue type
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants