Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using another IGM attenuation model than default #248

Open
YuichiHarikane opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Using another IGM attenuation model than default #248

YuichiHarikane opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@YuichiHarikane
Copy link

YuichiHarikane commented Jun 20, 2022

Hi,

Is there any way to change the IGM attenuation model from the default one (Madau 1995) to the latest one (e.g., Inoue et al. 2014)? I'm asking this because it seems that the best photometric redshift from prospector is systematically lower than spectroscopic ones at high redshift (z>4.5, see the attached plot). I'm wondering if this systematic offset disappears if I use Inoue's IGM attenuation model.

Thank you in advance,

Yuichi

fig_compare_zred_zspec

@bd-j
Copy link
Owner

bd-j commented Jun 20, 2022

The current IGM attenuation model is implemented within FSPS, so it would have to be changed there, or a new IGM attenuation functionality added to prospector. Have you tried scaling the IGM absorption curve with the "igm_factor" parameter?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants