-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move or fork these to teemtee
organization
#12
Comments
The In the future this content is planned to be moved to the guide where it will have a bit more prominent place in the documentation structure. All in all I'd say we have this covered. Any thoughts on this, @lukaszachy, @sopos? |
Because of the background of tmt users we treat beakerlib better than other frameworks however beakerlib and its libraries are older and separate from tmt itself. If tmt gains support for pytest one wouldn't expect to move pytest under teemtee org, right? IMO beakerlib is the same situation. So +1 to psss to have better documentation about beakerlib and libraries to make it easier for people not familiar with them. |
Ok, but doesn't it also make sense to have a list of |
Seems there's a bit of misunderstanding: The While It is true that the recently added feature to import remote plans now allows to share reusable plans. But, at least so far, there was not demand to create a shared repository for such plans as the setup is usually quite specific for given component. If there are such reusable plans, it could make sense to have them under the |
Aah, got it. I didn't look deeply in the libraries themselves. An instruction about |
@sopos, I guess it would be good to extend the libraries welcome page with some more details for those who are completely new to the concept. |
It is a bit unintuitive to come to
beakerlib
to look for reusabletmt
tests. At the very least this should be documented ontmt
repo and website where to look for these testsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: