Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable intellij -> neovim action sync #4

Open
kongluoxing opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Enable intellij -> neovim action sync #4

kongluoxing opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kongluoxing
Copy link

When intellij open a file, or editing a file, sync it back to neovim, or called two way sync

Why?
Eclipse provide a very useful java LSP: https://github.com/eclipse/eclipse.jdt.ls
Neovim + coc.nvim + eclipse.jdt.ls has provide a very nice java coding experience, but we need a debugger!
neither Vim nor Neovim provide much GUI event(such as mouse hover, interactable floating window, etc) to make a good debugger, event though DAP is included in eclipse.jdt.ls.
so I personally use Idea to debug, I use mission controll on my mac, put Idea and Neovim in one workspace, it just works. With Comrade, it works much better.
But when Idea debugger step into another file, Neovim doesn't open it, so I can't quickly fix bugs and restart debugger session

@beeender
Copy link
Owner

Hmm, that would be a missing feature.
Actually if you step into a file which is part of the project, I guess the neovim should open it automatically.
The missing part is if the new file is not contained by the project(for example, a disassembled java lib class), the Comrade will just ignore it.

I will try to get this fixed.
thanks for reporting!

@beeender beeender added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 17, 2019
@gvanbeck
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants