Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nimscripter for embedded systems #29

Open
davidvfx07 opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Nimscripter for embedded systems #29

davidvfx07 opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@davidvfx07
Copy link

I've been interested in creating a language that can be interpreted on embedded systems (esp32) for use in a larger project, which would provide an api to the user which calls precompiled procs etc. The goal would be to completely strip away nim's syntax, and replace it with simpler syntax with templates. macros, etc. I came across nimscripter which compiles great and works well on PC, but it won't compile for embedded with --os:standalone or --os:any (necessary for embedded systems, which have no os), and it screams Error: OS module not ported to your operating system!. I've stripped away the os module calls in the source of nimscripter, but it seems to be called elsewhere too because the error doesn't subside. Additionally, I'm unsure on how to go about pure standard libs because I can't seem to figure out how to embed those either.

Is there some way to stop the os module errors or strip out the os module calls entirely, and include standard libs at compile time?

Ultimately this may be impossible given the miniscule power of the esp32 to interpret nimscript on its own, and there may be other unforeseen reasons this won't work, but it would be a great tool for embedded programming and super helpful for the community.

@beef331
Copy link
Owner

beef331 commented Jun 29, 2024

Nim's VM relies on the compiler, so it requires some amount of OS calls to function. You would need to fork the nim compiler to handle that. Personally for embedded I'd suggest to look towards wasm for scripting.

@davidvfx07
Copy link
Author

Interesting, that makes sense. I'll update on an alternative if I find one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants