Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New ID for FLYTEX LTD #606

Open
MatviiG opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 10 comments · May be fixed by #627
Open

New ID for FLYTEX LTD #606

MatviiG opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 10 comments · May be fixed by #627

Comments

@MatviiG
Copy link

MatviiG commented Nov 7, 2024

Hi,

could you please add an ID for FLYTEX LTD
website: https://www.flytex.pro/
Targets: FLYTEX405 ; FLYTEX722

BR,
Matvii

@haslinghuis
Copy link
Member

haslinghuis commented Nov 7, 2024

@MatviiG
Copy link
Author

MatviiG commented Dec 4, 2024

Checkout https://betaflight.com/docs/development/manufacturer/requirements-for-submission-of-targets

@sugaarK

Hi @haslinghuis sorry for bothering you. I checked documentation You pointed - it says I need ID which I'm asking here, Information about company already provided, targets will be provided just after ID obtained. Or we should provide hardware design for review first?

@nerdCopter

This comment was marked as outdated.

@haslinghuis haslinghuis linked a pull request Dec 4, 2024 that will close this issue
@cvetaevvitaliy
Copy link
Contributor

@MatviiG You make clones on StingBee electronics

@cvetaevvitaliy
Copy link
Contributor

@sugaarK Please pay attention.

@MatviiG
Copy link
Author

MatviiG commented Dec 4, 2024

@MatviiG You make clones on StingBee electronics
@cvetaevvitaliy In case we make clones - why we need our own id for configuration?

@cvetaevvitaliy
Copy link
Contributor

cvetaevvitaliy commented Dec 4, 2024

@MatviiG You make clones on StingBee electronics
@cvetaevvitaliy In case we make clones - why we need our own id for configuration?

hm, Say hello to Andrew
Stealing electronics drawings from the factory Eurocom eurocom-c.com and appropriating them for yourself is not very nice.

@sugaarK
Copy link
Member

sugaarK commented Dec 5, 2024

this isn't going any where until the issue of cloning is addressed

@MatviiG
Copy link
Author

MatviiG commented Dec 10, 2024

@cvetaevvitaliy So. as You talked yesterday with us about FC we are going to produce - are there still objections from your side about it? Is it still is blocked?

@cvetaevvitaliy
Copy link
Contributor

cvetaevvitaliy commented Dec 10, 2024

@cvetaevvitaliy So. as You talked yesterday with us about FC we are going to produce - are there still objections from your side about it? Is it still is blocked?

No, we thought about the option of cooperation, nothing more.
Need time for final.
P.S. you can try to create your own project

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants