Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaling solution #2

Open
seichris opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Scaling solution #2

seichris opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working feature open scaling

Comments

@seichris
Copy link
Member

Using Ethereum Mainnet for sending small amounts of tokens is infeasible. That's why currently, Better pools funds in contracts on the NEAR chain.

To be able to scale Better and not be bound to only NEAR-based tokens, we are looking into different scalability solutions. Which one should we use?

  • L2s: Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, other
  • Rollups: Optimism, Arbitrum, ZkSync, other
@seichris seichris changed the title Which token transfer scaling solution Scaling solution May 31, 2022
@seichris seichris self-assigned this May 31, 2022
@seichris seichris added open bug Something isn't working feature scaling and removed bug Something isn't working labels May 31, 2022
@seichris
Copy link
Member Author

seichris commented Jun 1, 2022

Questions to us:

  • Can we re-use solidity contract on diff networks?
  • Can we re-use our NEAR contracts for x

@seichris
Copy link
Member Author

seichris commented Jun 1, 2022

This issue has 1 bounties.
Chain: near, Bounty ID: undefined

@seichris
Copy link
Member Author

seichris commented Jun 1, 2022

Most likely we'll need a solidity contract

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working feature open scaling
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant