Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: format with Ruff #65

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024
Merged

style: format with Ruff #65

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor

@jsstevenson jsstevenson commented Jun 5, 2024

Per a previous discussion, this PR implements only the formatting half of ruff.

@jsstevenson jsstevenson marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2024 11:55
@jsstevenson jsstevenson requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 11:55
Copy link

@korikuzma korikuzma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jsstevenson do you plan on adding a .git-blame-ignore-revs file? More here

pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@korikuzma sure, the # of changes is fairly minimal but we can

@korikuzma
Copy link

@korikuzma sure, the # of changes is fairly minimal but we can

@jsstevenson Ya, I think it'd be good to do for all the other ruff format PRs too

Copy link

@korikuzma korikuzma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See thread above (trying to remove from my requested reviews)

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Contributor Author

ope didn't commit

@jsstevenson jsstevenson merged commit f82e37d into main Jun 26, 2024
13 checks passed
@jsstevenson jsstevenson deleted the ruff-format branch June 26, 2024 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants