Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Algorithms for assessing integrity and quality of mappings #35

Open
cthoyt opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Algorithms for assessing integrity and quality of mappings #35

cthoyt opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@cthoyt
Copy link
Member

cthoyt commented Dec 29, 2020

There are some great polar graph algorithms for this kind of stuff!

  1. Look for n-cycles with all equivalent but one not-equivalent relation
  2. Triangles and other cliques mean the same relation was curated many times. For each component, calculate the "density" and assign to all relations
  3. Could namespace pairs have a prior confidence? Are there pairs of namespaces we expect don't go together, and therefore should have lower confidence in mappings?
  4. Do more curation for a curator consensus (2 curators agree -> great!, 2 curators disagree -> not so much)
  5. Look in connected components for the same namespace appearing twice
cthoyt added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant