You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suggestion: Python/Biopython commands, keywords, module/function names should be formatted as inline-code with single backticks, e.g. Bio.SeqIO ??? Or bold???
If applicable, they can also serve as links to the respective Wiki page
Code output and command-line examples should be formatted as block code with three backticks instead of several single line inline-code statements.
Code should be checked for a minimum of PEP8 compliance.
The code should work (as it is) under Biopython 1.66
Since we are recommending Python 3.5 as environment, the code should work under Python 3.5 ???
Links
Check all links
'Repair' broken links
Try to find a link that's more likely to be stable. E.g. for papers I think that dx.doi.org references (or Pubmed references) are more stable than linking to a special page of the respective journal or private or institutional homepages. With http://www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery/ you can do a reverse doi lookup for a given paper.
Some pages used a PubMed plugin under MediaWiki to display references (Publication entries #12). Since it's unlikely (?) to have a functional replacement, I would suggest to convert them to simple links.
RSS feeds
As above, embedding an existing RSS feed seems hard (Embedded RSS/Atom news feed #4), again I would suggest replace with a link pointing to the RSS feed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, as with the main Tutorial and docstrings, try to make code examples work on both Python 2 and 3 (using simple print functions with one variable). If not easy, I think it is time to prefer Python 3 syntax but perhaps the example should not this explicit for the lingering Python 2 users.
As suggested by Markus Piotrowski
Checklist:
Bio.SeqIO
??? Or bold???Try to find a link that's more likely to be stable. E.g. for papers I think that dx.doi.org references (or Pubmed references) are more stable than linking to a special page of the respective journal or private or institutional homepages. With http://www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery/ you can do a reverse doi lookup for a given paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: