Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Huge memory usage increase in v0.19.1+ #1289

Open
dmitriishaburov opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Huge memory usage increase in v0.19.1+ #1289

dmitriishaburov opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
backlog Issues/PRs that will be included in the project roadmap

Comments

@dmitriishaburov
Copy link

Which component:
Controller v0.19.1+
(didn't checked v0.19.0 since it doesn't have published chart

Describe the bug
After update from any previous version memory usage from ~7mb to ~50+ mb (slightly drops after some time)

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Update from v0.18.5 to v0.19.1
  2. Check graph on memory usage of container
image

Expected behavior
Memory usage not increase so drastically

Version of Kubernetes:

  • Output of kubectl version:
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"26", GitVersion:"v1.26.3", GitCommit:"9e644106593f3f4aa98f8a84b23db5fa378900bd", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2023-03-15T13:40:17Z", GoVersion:"go1.19.7", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Kustomize Version: v4.5.7
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"25+", GitVersion:"v1.25.12-eks-2d98532", GitCommit:"0aa16cf4fac4da27b9e9e9ba570b990867f6a3d8", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2023-07-28T16:52:04Z", GoVersion:"go1.20.6", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}

Additional context
Basically we're running controllers with 20MB limits/requests in the kubernetes.
It was OK for a long time, but new version went to OOMKilled and only runs now with at least 60MB or more

While that's not a big numbers at all, it's still strange that there's so big memory usage spike without getting some cool additional features.

Feel free to close the issue though since it's mostly just a rant 😄

@dmitriishaburov dmitriishaburov added the triage Issues/PRs that need to be reviewed label Aug 15, 2023
@alvneiayu alvneiayu added backlog Issues/PRs that will be included in the project roadmap and removed triage Issues/PRs that need to be reviewed labels Aug 16, 2023
@alvneiayu
Copy link
Collaborator

hi @dmitriishaburov

Thanks to let us know that. We are going to investigate it because it is pretty curious. I think that during this release version, we included the Secret informer to regenerate the secrets managing by Sealed Secrets when they are removed manually by the users.

Let me investigate it, again thanks a lot for letting us know.

Álvaro

@dmitriishaburov
Copy link
Author

dmitriishaburov commented Feb 21, 2024

Tested, up to ~10x higher memory usage is still there, but now possible to migitage by skipRecreate: true

On graph: old version / two pods on latest version / latest version with skipRecreate
image

Probably issue can be closed if there's no plans for reviewing mem usage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog Issues/PRs that will be included in the project roadmap
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants