You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a user story for a feature/enhancement request from one of the b.p.shop merchants we work with.
As a merchant I want to allow for different tax rates within the one shop/site for existing/repeat customers.
They indicated that their preferred solution would be the separate tax rates to be group based and work in a similar way to discounting.
Example use case:
Their customers consist of an established network of dealers and they want to be able to base the differential tax treatment on the geographical location of these dealers:
Group 1 – UK resident dealers: always attract 20% local VAT
Group 2 – EU resident dealers who have provided their VAT equivalent number: always attract 0% VAT
Group 3 – EU resident dealers who have not given us a number: always attract 20% VAT
Does anyone else have a use case for this feature? Any input/thoughts are appreciated.
We have also had some talk regarding adding support for muli-currency support within the one site, however I suspect that is deserving of a separate issue/discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a user story for a feature/enhancement request from one of the b.p.shop merchants we work with.
As a merchant I want to allow for different tax rates within the one shop/site for existing/repeat customers.
They indicated that their preferred solution would be the separate tax rates to be group based and work in a similar way to discounting.
Example use case:
Their customers consist of an established network of dealers and they want to be able to base the differential tax treatment on the geographical location of these dealers:
Does anyone else have a use case for this feature? Any input/thoughts are appreciated.
We have also had some talk regarding adding support for muli-currency support within the one site, however I suspect that is deserving of a separate issue/discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: