Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inaccurate Current Usage for Matrix > Asset fields and Matrix > Supertable > Asset fields #35

Open
howells opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@howells
Copy link

howells commented Aug 16, 2022

I might be missing something here but the "Current Usage" for practically all assets on a site that uses matrix fields extensively shows "Unused". The site is a multi-site set up but whether it's the default site, or another, doesn't seem to have an affect (I'm using 2.3.1).

Two examples here but this applies throughout -

Via an asset field within Supertable, within a Matrix:

CleanShot 2022-08-16 at 09 15 23@2x

CleanShot 2022-08-16 at 09 16 01@2x

Via an asset field, within a Matrix:

CleanShot 2022-08-16 at 09 17 19@2x

CleanShot 2022-08-16 at 09 17 52@2x

@darylknight
Copy link

Yeah, this plugin has been completely unusable for a long time, for a number of reasons. False positives, false negatives, incompatibility with drafts, revisions etc. I'm not sure it's still actually maintained. Which is a shame, as this seems to be the only plugin providing something that all our clients want.

@roelvanhintum
Copy link
Member

@darylknight the plugin is maintained, but the problems with detecting usage are how much queries we should perform per asset. If we query a lot per asset, the performance of the asset overview would be insanely bad. I did try numerous times to get better numbers, but it's either missing things or resulting in minutes of load time. Feel free to suggest improvements, if you see any.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants