Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redo json --> numpy --> bounding box outputs #2

Open
2 of 6 tasks
brialorelle opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 6 tasks

Redo json --> numpy --> bounding box outputs #2

brialorelle opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@brialorelle
Copy link
Owner

brialorelle commented May 15, 2020

  • Code review on json --> numpy array code together; sanity check outputs with video frames
  • Carefully strip videonames of extensions so easy for merging with other data (i.e. get rid of .AVI or .mp4, or .AVI.mp4 which does occur)
  • Decide how to include bounding boxes of size zero in final outputs (and whether doable to include empty lines when no detedctions)
  • Resave OP jsons outputs as numpy arrays with ALL people (not just first three in each frame)
  • Backup all numpy arrays outside of sherlock (langcog server)
  • Host large csvs from bounding box outputs on OSF or other permanent repo, and backup these output csvs on langcog server as well
@ketan0 ketan0 self-assigned this May 16, 2020
@kachergis
Copy link
Collaborator

Any sticky issues here? What can we do to help?

@ketan0
Copy link
Collaborator

ketan0 commented Jun 1, 2020

Hey—no sticky issues here. (Sorry for no commits over past couple days, have been busy with other work) I will be sure to backup the OP outputs to Langcog once they finish running (gonna start running Alice and Sam videos today.) I’m not as familiar with the bounding box code, so I have not approached those todo items.

@kachergis
Copy link
Collaborator

No worries on the bounding boxes -- I've got that! Mostly curious if you're happy and confident in json-->numpy output

@ketan0
Copy link
Collaborator

ketan0 commented Jun 2, 2020

Ah awesome, thanks for doing that. I think that I am satisfied with the new condensed output format, as long as it's easy for you guys to manipulate in R (I find it to be so in Python.) Is it easy to load these dataframes with R's available packages (dplyr)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants