We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者您好,有一个疑惑点希望您能帮忙解答。 按照我的理解,get_target返回的noobj_mask是根据未调整时候的先验框与真实框的iou将最大的先验框的noobj_mask置为0,即存在物体。而get_ignore则又将get_target返回的noobj_mask根据调整后的先验框又做了一遍这个工作。这样一来的话,get_target中的这个操作是不是就没有什么意义了?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
get_ignore还计算了别的框呀
Sorry, something went wrong.
感谢您的回答,您说的对,get_ignore还计算了别的框, 所以我问的是get_target里面的noobj_mask[b, k, j, i] = 0是不是多余了,在get_target里将未调整的先验框与真实框的iou将最大的先验框的noobj_mask置为0。假设被选中的这个序号为2,那么这个框是不是在get_ignore方法里同样也会被再次选中一次? 感谢您的解惑
会再次选中,但是第二次不一定会选中
No branches or pull requests
作者您好,有一个疑惑点希望您能帮忙解答。
按照我的理解,get_target返回的noobj_mask是根据未调整时候的先验框与真实框的iou将最大的先验框的noobj_mask置为0,即存在物体。而get_ignore则又将get_target返回的noobj_mask根据调整后的先验框又做了一遍这个工作。这样一来的话,get_target中的这个操作是不是就没有什么意义了?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: