Is it possible to use Quic transport? #4037
-
|
Is it possible to use another protocol for transport, like QUIC, so that NAT traversal is a bit easier? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
@waqasraz yes, it's possible. Ockam Secure Channels sit on top of Ockam Routing. Ockam Transports plug into Ockam Routing and provide adaptors for various transport protocols. Currently we have Ockam Transports for TCP, UDP, Unix Domain Sockets, WebSockets and Bluetooth Low Energy. See the It should be possible to write a QUIC transport. TCP NAT traversal is supported using Relays. We also have plans for UDP NAT Traversal on our roadmap, please see #3507 for a description of how that would work. If someone in our community would like to work on that issue we would love to help along the way. I'd also love to learn more about your use case and what you're trying to build. This will help suggest the best path forward. You can share it here or email me at Also, thank you for an awesome first PR last week 🥳 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@waqasraz yes, it's possible.
Ockam Secure Channels sit on top of Ockam Routing. Ockam Transports plug into Ockam Routing and provide adaptors for various transport protocols. Currently we have Ockam Transports for TCP, UDP, Unix Domain Sockets, WebSockets and Bluetooth Low Energy. See the
ockam_transport_*rust crates hereIt should be possible to write a QUIC transport.
TCP NAT traversal is supported using Relays.
We also have plans for UDP NAT Traversal on our roadmap, please see #3507 for a description of how that would work. If someone in our community would like to work on that issue we would love to help along the way.
I'd also love to learn more about your use case and what you're…