-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate session service architecture #6005
Comments
From a development POV of a session service consumer, I think it's better to require session service because otherwise we would have to maintain two parallel systems: using session service, and using localStorage. |
It may be a good idea to do that ultimately, but definitely not this round v3.0.0. We should evaluate the options.
see #5771
Agreed and we have decided to make sessions service a requirement #5773. We also decide not to use local storage b/c user data cannot be maintained between computers.
?? |
Thanks @jjgao ! Regarding testing session service. We currently have no tests of session service standalone. I made an issue of what I think should be doable: There's also a known issue with testing review apps. You could still use the localStorage trick to test, but one can't use the review app directly to log in. Maybe not that big of a deal |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
@inodb I am going to close this one. Please create separate issues if still relevant, e.g. testing. |
With session service becoming more and more an integral part of cBioPortal, we should re-evaluate its architecture.
Questions to answer:
CC: @mandawilson @n1zea144 @kalletlak @alisman @adamabeshouse
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: