You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I’m Lucas! I’m a hobby developer who’s been using @carbon/react and @carbon/ibm-products for a while, mainly to build internal tools at my job as a mechanical engineer. Although this isn’t part of my formal role, I love working with the Carbon Design System and use it for most of my projects. I’m not an expert in UI/UX, but I’d love to contribute by tackling issues and learning more about the process. Huge thanks to IBM for open-sourcing such an amazing design system!
Proposal: Enhancing Open Source Collaboration in @carbon/ibm-products
Context
The @carbon-design-system/ibm-products repository is, in my opinion, a very important resource for users, while the @carbon-design-system/carbon monorepo provides essential primitives, this repository effectively implements patterns widely used in real-world applications. While publicly available, much of the reasoning, design explorations, and resources remain within IBM’s internal platforms. This includes:
A product gallery showcasing real-world use of the design system.
Design exploration documents explaining the rationale behind decisions.
These resources are incredibly valuable but currently unavailable to the wider open-source community. While understandable, this makes it harder for external contributors to:
Understand the design system’s goals and roadmap.
Gain inspiration from existing implementations.
Actively contribute to its evolution.
This can limit adoption and innovation within the open-source community.
I've created this discussion (and I hope this is the right place for this) to suggest a few things:
Publicly Share Select Resources:
A public version of the product gallery to inspire the community.
Sanitized design exploration documents focusing on the “why” behind decisions.
Facilitate Collaboration:
Open forums or discussions to gather community feedback.
A partially open roadmap to guide contributors on upcoming work.
I understand that some resources need to remain internal, but curated materials and increased collaboration could significantly benefit both IBM and the community.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi, I’m Lucas! I’m a hobby developer who’s been using @carbon/react and @carbon/ibm-products for a while, mainly to build internal tools at my job as a mechanical engineer. Although this isn’t part of my formal role, I love working with the Carbon Design System and use it for most of my projects. I’m not an expert in UI/UX, but I’d love to contribute by tackling issues and learning more about the process. Huge thanks to IBM for open-sourcing such an amazing design system!
Proposal: Enhancing Open Source Collaboration in @carbon/ibm-products
Context
The @carbon-design-system/ibm-products repository is, in my opinion, a very important resource for users, while the @carbon-design-system/carbon monorepo provides essential primitives, this repository effectively implements patterns widely used in real-world applications. While publicly available, much of the reasoning, design explorations, and resources remain within IBM’s internal platforms. This includes:
These resources are incredibly valuable but currently unavailable to the wider open-source community. While understandable, this makes it harder for external contributors to:
This can limit adoption and innovation within the open-source community.
I've created this discussion (and I hope this is the right place for this) to suggest a few things:
Publicly Share Select Resources:
Facilitate Collaboration:
I understand that some resources need to remain internal, but curated materials and increased collaboration could significantly benefit both IBM and the community.
Thanks you all very much!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions