-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Git LFS bandwidth issue #60
Comments
Which repositories have we been using Git LFS in? It's something that has to be enabled per repo isn't it? I don't even have |
Git LFS bandwidth is consumed when downloads occur for users that have Git LFS enabled:
As of July 19th, 20022 we only have 0.02 GB of data stored on Git LFS in the Since July 13th, about 18 actions have been run on the branch with git lfs. However, the actions/checkout@v3 LFS option is disabled so the actions are not downloading the LFS files. The more likely culprit are bots with git lfs enabled cloning the repo. The repo was cloned 48 times since July 13th - July 19th: I don't think this accounts for all the bandwidth and assumes the cloners have SolutionsI enabled git lfs on the pudl-usage-metrics repo so I could store some old old Audit logs that weren't captured by the log sink. Given we aren't using the audit logs anymore I could just remove the old logs from this repo and disable git lfs. If we want to keep the logs around I could store them in a GCS bucket or Google Drive. If git lfs is going to produce egress bandwidth issues in the future it looks like we might be able to disable git lfs on the organization level. |
If the additional user data that we'd hoped was available from the audit logs isn't actually there, and we aren't going to use them going forward for usage metrics, it seems like removing them and disabling LFS is probably the way to go. What do you think? |
Yeah, that sounds good to me. I removed the git lfs files from |
On July 15th, 2022 we saw our Git LFS bandwidth consumed within a couple of hours. We went from 100% to 127% in a few hours. This isn't a huge deal because an additional 50GB of bandwidth is $5 a month. However, we should figure out why this unexpected increase in bandwidth occurred.
(Screenshot from July 15th, 2022)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: