Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate 2021+ FERC-714 XBRL data #3675

Closed
zaneselvans opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Integrate 2021+ FERC-714 XBRL data #3675

zaneselvans opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
ferc714 Anything having to do with FERC Form 714 good-first-issue Good issues for first-time contributors. Self-contained, low context, no credentials required. new-data Requests for integration of new data. xbrl Related to the FERC XBRL transition

Comments

@zaneselvans
Copy link
Member

Overview

Thus far we have only integrated the 2006-2020 FERC-714 data, which was published as CSV dumps from VisualFoxPro DBF database files. Since 2021 this data has been transitioned to XBRL, but we haven't integrated it yet. To have the most up to date hourly demand and 10-year load forecast data available, we should get the FERC-714.

Logistics

  • We are already archiving the post-2020 FERC-714 XBRL data and converting it to SQLite for convenient extraction.
  • We would need to adapt / repurpose our existing XBRL extraction infrastructure to getting the FERC-714 data.
  • Structurally the tables we're pulling from FERC-714 are simple, and only have a few columns each.
  • Currently in PUDL we have out_ferc714__hourly_planning_area_demand.
  • Transform FERC-714 load forecast table #3519 and Transform FERC-714 load forecast table #3670 will bring in the 10-year load forecast table.

What do you know about it so far?

  • There's probably a bunch of new timezone / timestamp issues to clean up in the newer years of data for consistency with the old data in the hourly demand table.
  • The newer years of data have even more freeform utility IDs -- there's the FERC-714 ID (which is different from the FERC-1 IDs) and then a choose-your-own-adventure ID, many of which are from EIA, but not all. So there will be some manual mapping, but there's only ~100 planning areas so this is tractable even if it's all manual.
@zaneselvans zaneselvans added new-data Requests for integration of new data. ferc714 Anything having to do with FERC Form 714 xbrl Related to the FERC XBRL transition labels Jun 17, 2024
@zaneselvans zaneselvans added the good-first-issue Good issues for first-time contributors. Self-contained, low context, no credentials required. label Jun 17, 2024
@zaneselvans zaneselvans moved this from New to Backlog in Catalyst Megaproject Jun 17, 2024
@e-belfer
Copy link
Member

@zaneselvans Was this issue addressed by #3809, and should it be closed? If not, it probably wants to be updated.

@zaneselvans
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah I think this is good to close now! 🎉

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Catalyst Megaproject Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ferc714 Anything having to do with FERC Form 714 good-first-issue Good issues for first-time contributors. Self-contained, low context, no credentials required. new-data Requests for integration of new data. xbrl Related to the FERC XBRL transition
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants