-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Empty charge_distributions in QuickExact-Simulation #667
Comments
I have also tried installing pyfiction from the master branch |
Hi @contra-bit, Thank you for your detailed bug report. We are looking into it and come back to you as soon as possible. |
Hi @contra-bit, I cannot reproduce the issue on Ubuntu 24.04 running the commands in a Python interpreter (3.13.0) after installing the bindings with Can you tell me: does the ground state for input 00 show up like it should? |
I have checkout your test branch and run the tests with nox. I have lots of test failures. |
Also for some strange reason lots of more tests failed before i ran |
What branch is that? |
I'm getting this too locally. We're not sure what causes it. |
git fetch origin pull/668/head:pr-668
git checkout pr-668 These are the only two commits which where added:
|
🤔 Do these tests fail only for me? 🤷♂️
|
fiction version
0.6.8
OS
Ubuntu 24.10
Python version
3.12.7
C++ compiler
g++ (Ubuntu 14.2.0-4ubuntu2) 14.2.0
Additional environment information
I have activated the virtual environment (.venv) using uv before running the notebook. I would appreciate any help in resolving this issue.
Please let me know if you need any further information or if there's anything else I can provide to help resolve this issue. @Drewniok
Description
I am experiencing an issue with the "sidb_gate_designs_and_analysis" notebook from the repository https://github.com/cda-tum/mnt-sidb-technology-demo. The "charge_distributions" of the QuickExact-Simulation are empty.
I am using the following versions:
Expected behavior
Expected result: The "charge_distributions" of the QuickExact-Simulation should not be empty.
Actual result: The "charge_distributions" of the QuickExact-Simulation are empty.
How to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: