You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if the example in usage.py for calibrating the RPCs using calibrate_rpc can also be used as-is with the same optional arguments for updating the RPC model with new point sets? Or is there a recommended set of values for the optional arguments when updating?
is something like this the best way to accomplish an update to the RPC model?
# fit on training set
rpc_calib, log = rpc_fit.calibrate_rpc(target_train, locs_train, separate=False, tol=1e-10
, max_iter=20, method='initLcurve'
, plot=True, orientation = 'projloc', get_log=True )
# add new points to update rpc
rpc_update, log_update = rpc_fit.calibrate_rpc(target_update, locs_update, separate=False, tol=1e-10
, max_iter=20, method='initLcurve'
, plot=True, orientation = 'projloc', get_log=True,
init=rpc_calib)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I was wondering if the example in
usage.py
for calibrating the RPCs usingcalibrate_rpc
can also be used as-is with the same optional arguments for updating the RPC model with new point sets? Or is there a recommended set of values for the optional arguments when updating?is something like this the best way to accomplish an update to the RPC model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: