You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my recent PR https://github.com/liftoffio/liftoff/pull/12386 I added more than a 100 functions to the indent-overrides. All of them could've been specified with a single regexp expression. See the corresponding PR comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sure, I'm open to this. Could you be a bit more specific, though? How would the configuration work? Right now there's an optional namespace qualifier; how would that work if we gave a regex instead of a string?
Another option might be to be a bit more restrictive and instead of allowing arbitrary regular expressions, allow for matching certain prefixes. I think that covers all the existing use cases. It also covers the built-in indentation rules that cljfmt uses -- certain special prefixes (def, let, send-, and so on) get IndentListBody rather than IndentList.
Perhaps after we add this generalization, we could change the way the default indents work to being a default cljfmt config file rather than being hardcoded.
In my recent PR https://github.com/liftoffio/liftoff/pull/12386 I added more than a 100 functions to the indent-overrides. All of them could've been specified with a single regexp expression. See the corresponding PR comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: