You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Tor 0.3.5 is introducing a new option HiddenServiceExportCircuitID which sends the circuit ID with Haproxy's proxy protocol to the service (Charybdis) using unused IPv6 address space.
I think supporting it could be desirable even if users can just request a new identity from Tor as it won't show them as connecting from 127.0.0.1 anymore and I think it might make one user making multiple connections from the same host more obvious.
When I asked if it's supported on IRC, I got these responses that may be helpful:
2018-10-08T21:26:43+0300 <mr_flea> Mikaela: I don't think there's support for it right now. I looked into writing it a while back but never ended up implementing it as it was unneeded at the time. however, it seems pretty easy to write a module for; it can be implemented as a command during registration 2018-10-08T21:27:14+0300 <mr_flea> the WEBIRC module does something very similar and could be modified to support the (human-readable, v1 variant) of proxy protocol 2018-10-08T21:27:38+0300 <mr_flea> the binary variant is more difficult to support (but it doesn't look like that's what Tor is implementing)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tor 0.3.5 is introducing a new option HiddenServiceExportCircuitID which sends the circuit ID with Haproxy's proxy protocol to the service (Charybdis) using unused IPv6 address space.
I think supporting it could be desirable even if users can just request a new identity from Tor as it won't show them as connecting from 127.0.0.1 anymore and I think it might make one user making multiple connections from the same host more obvious.
When I asked if it's supported on IRC, I got these responses that may be helpful:
2018-10-08T21:26:43+0300 <mr_flea> Mikaela: I don't think there's support for it right now. I looked into writing it a while back but never ended up implementing it as it was unneeded at the time. however, it seems pretty easy to write a module for; it can be implemented as a command during registration
2018-10-08T21:27:14+0300 <mr_flea> the WEBIRC module does something very similar and could be modified to support the (human-readable, v1 variant) of proxy protocol
2018-10-08T21:27:38+0300 <mr_flea> the binary variant is more difficult to support (but it doesn't look like that's what Tor is implementing)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: