Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adaptations 2.0 - use class based Adaptation instead of module functions #254

Open
christofmuc opened this issue Jul 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Epic Large task

Comments

@christofmuc
Copy link
Owner

christofmuc commented Jul 2, 2023

@bboc I'm back now and slowly starting to work on this again. Thinking about this there might be an opportunity to create a "version 2" Adaptation interface in Python that can work with objects/classes rather than modules. The original modules are good but run into problems as soon as you want to use inheritace like I do with the generic Sequential and Roland modules - jumping through hoops there.

Generally, the C++ capabilities are maybe better designed with the Python code a simplified layer on top of them to make it easier (but less powerful) to write adaptations. In the beginning I thought we might want to implement complex synths in C++, but by now I think all synths should be in Python, it is so much easier than C++.

Originally posted by @christofmuc in #238 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Epic Large task
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant