Whether the svdd in libsvm can support negative examples? #128
Comments
|
For oneclass or svdd, the input is not labelled.. So it doesn't matter
if you indicate the training labels as positive or negative
…On 2018-11-06 09:00, Xu Ma wrote:
Whether the svdd or one class svm in libsvm can support negative
examples?
The readme file says "For one-class SVM, is not used and can be any
number".
However, the link "#74 [1] " say "Support for negative examples in
one-class added".
So, I am really confused. Thank you very much for your patience and I
am looking forward for your reply.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [2], or mute the
thread [3]. [ { ***@***.***": "http://schema.org", ***@***.***":
"EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { ***@***.***": "ViewAction", "target":
"#128", "url":
"#128", "name": "View Issue" },
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { ***@***.***":
"Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } }, {
***@***.***": "MessageCard", ***@***.***": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false", "originator":
"AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB", "title": "Whether the svdd in
libsvm can support negative examples? (#128)", "sections": [ { "text":
"", "activityTitle": "**Xu Ma**", "activityImage":
"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": ***@***.***", "facts": [ { "name": "Repository:
", "value": "cjlin1/libsvm" }, { "name": "Issue #: ", "value": 128 } ]
} ], "potentialAction": [ { "name": "Add a comment", ***@***.***":
"ActionCard", "inputs": [ { "isMultiLine": true, ***@***.***": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment", "isRequired": false } ], "actions": [ { "name":
"Comment", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\":
\"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\":
\"cjlin1/libsvm\",\n\"issueId\": 128,\n\"IssueComment\":
\"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}" } ] }, { "name": "Close issue",
***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target": "https://api.github.com", "body":
"{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\":
\"cjlin1/libsvm\",\n\"issueId\": 128\n}" }, { "targets": [ { "os":
"default", "uri": "#128" } ],
***@***.***": "OpenUri", "name": "View on GitHub" }, { "name":
"Unsubscribe", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target":
"https://api.github.com", "body": "{\n\"commandName\":
\"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 406731445\n}" } ], "themeColor":
"26292E" } ]
Links:
------
[1] #74
[2] #128
[3]
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFGwnu_FL79bDnEDJRxAPpHV_R01FN1-ks5usN8pgaJpZM4YPjq1
|
Thank you , but in the svdd paper, svdd is able to support negative examples. And I saw #74 seem added this function. So, in libsvm, one-class-svm is not support for negative examples now? |
|
No we don't plan to support this
…On 2018-11-08 03:27, Xu Ma wrote:
> For oneclass or svdd, the input is not labelled.. So it doesn't
> matter if you indicate the training labels as positive or negative
> …
> On 2018-11-06 09:00, Xu Ma wrote: Whether the svdd or one class svm
> in libsvm can support negative examples? The readme file says "For
> one-class SVM, is not used and can be any number". However, the link
> "#74 [1] [1] " say "Support for negative examples in one-class
> added". So, I am really confused. Thank you very much for your
> patience and I am looking forward for your reply. -- You are
> receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to
> this email directly, view it on GitHub [2], or mute the thread [3].
> [ { ***@***.***": "http://schema.org", ***@***.***": "EmailMessage",
> "potentialAction": { ***@***.***": "ViewAction", "target": "#128
> [2]", "url": "#128 [2]", "name": "View Issue" }, "description":
> "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { ***@***.***":
> "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } }, {
> ***@***.***": "MessageCard", ***@***.***":
> "http://schema.org/extensions", "hideOriginalBody": "false",
> "originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB", "title":
> "Whether the svdd in libsvm can support negative examples? (#128
> [2])", "sections": [ { "text": "", "activityTitle": "XU MA",
> "activityImage":
>
"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
> "activitySubtitle": ***@***.***", "facts": [ { "name": "Repository:
> ", "value": "cjlin1/libsvm" }, { "name": "Issue #: ", "value": 128 }
> ] } ], "potentialAction": [ { "name": "Add a comment", ***@***.***":
> "ActionCard", "inputs": [ { "isMultiLine": true, ***@***.***":
> "TextInput", "id": "IssueComment", "isRequired": false } ],
> "actions": [ { "name": "Comment", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST",
> "target": "https://api.github.com", "body": "{\n"commandName":
> "IssueComment",\n"repositoryFullName": "cjlin1/libsvm",\n"issueId":
> 128,\n"IssueComment": "{{IssueComment.value}}"\n}" } ] }, { "name":
> "Close issue", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target":
> "https://api.github.com", "body": "{\n"commandName":
> "IssueClose",\n"repositoryFullName": "cjlin1/libsvm",\n"issueId":
> 128\n}" }, { "targets": [ { "os": "default", "uri": "#128 [2]" } ],
> ***@***.***": "OpenUri", "name": "View on GitHub" }, { "name":
> "Unsubscribe", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target":
> "https://api.github.com", "body": "{\n"commandName":
> "MuteNotification",\n"threadId": 406731445\n}" } ], "themeColor":
> "26292E" } ] Links: ------ [1] #74 [1] [2] #128 [2] [3]
>
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFGwnu_FL79bDnEDJRxAPpHV_R01FN1-ks5usN8pgaJpZM4YPjq1
Thank you , but in the svdd paper, svdd is able to support negative
examples. And I saw #74 [1] seem added this function. So, in libsvm,
one-class-svm is not support for negative examples now?
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [3], or mute the
thread [4]. [ { ***@***.***": "http://schema.org", ***@***.***":
"EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { ***@***.***": "ViewAction", "target":
"#128 (comment)",
"url":
"#128 (comment)",
"name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": { ***@***.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url":
"https://github.com" } }, { ***@***.***": "MessageCard", ***@***.***":
"http://schema.org/extensions", "hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB", "title": "Re:
[cjlin1/libsvm] Whether the svdd in libsvm can support negative
examples? (#128)", "sections": [ { "text": "", "activityTitle": "**Xu
Ma**", "activityImage":
"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": ***@***.***", "facts": [ ] } ],
"potentialAction": [ { "name": "Add a comment", ***@***.***": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [ { "isMultiLine": true, ***@***.***": "TextInput", "id":
"IssueComment", "isRequired": false } ], "actions": [ { "name":
"Comment", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\":
\"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\":
\"cjlin1/libsvm\",\n\"issueId\": 128,\n\"IssueComment\":
\"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}" } ] }, { "name": "Close issue",
***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target": "https://api.github.com", "body":
"{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\":
\"cjlin1/libsvm\",\n\"issueId\": 128\n}" }, { "targets": [ { "os":
"default", "uri":
"#128 (comment)" }
], ***@***.***": "OpenUri", "name": "View on GitHub" }, { "name":
"Unsubscribe", ***@***.***": "HttpPOST", "target":
"https://api.github.com", "body": "{\n\"commandName\":
\"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 406731445\n}" } ], "themeColor":
"26292E" } ]
Links:
------
[1] #74
[2] #128
[3] #128 (comment)
[4]
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFGwnj9Vu5MEtLlqvH_OVoXx9HpNaHuoks5uszQ-gaJpZM4YPjq1
|
|
Thank you very much for your reply. Have a good day ^_^ |
Whether the svdd or one class svm in libsvm can support negative examples?
The readme file says "For one-class SVM, label is not used and can be any number".
However, the link "#74 " say "Support for negative examples in one-class added".
So, I am really confused. Thank you very much for your patience and I am looking forward for your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: