Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

annotated(funcs, traces) should be annotated(traces, funcs)? #2

Open
CapsAdmin opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

annotated(funcs, traces) should be annotated(traces, funcs)? #2

CapsAdmin opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@CapsAdmin
Copy link

If you do loom.annotated(loom.off()) or loom.off(loom.annotated) the arguments are swapped and you get a table with nothing. This had me scratching my head for a while until I realized the argument order was just swapped.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@CapsAdmin