Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation is lacking #13

Open
kmadaras opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Documentation is lacking #13

kmadaras opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@kmadaras
Copy link

kmadaras commented Oct 19, 2024

I've purchased a lifetime subscription to msty with the hope of simplifying LLM management, particularly for local models and basic client functionality. However, I'm encountering some challenges due to a lack of comprehensive documentation. Here are my main concerns:

  1. Instructions: There's a lack of clear instructions on how everything is supposed to work, especially for users utilizing local models.

  2. LocalAI Tuning: While there are numerous options for tuning LocalAI, there's insufficient information on which settings to adjust for optimal results.

  3. Web Search Functionality: Despite enabling web search for real-time data, the AI models often insist they don't have internet access, even when web results appear in the chat. This inconsistency persists across several locally hosted models, despite appropriate prompting.

  4. Documentation: The current documentation seems limited to tooltips. A more comprehensive base documentation would greatly enhance the tool's usability and effectiveness.

  5. Implementation Details: More information on the underlying implementation would be helpful for troubleshooting issues like the web search inconsistency mentioned above.

In summary, while the tool shows promise, the lack of detailed documentation makes it challenging to use effectively. At minimum, I'd request the development of base documentation that goes beyond the current tooltips. If such documentation already exists and I've overlooked it, please point me in the right direction.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns. I believe addressing them would significantly improve the user experience for those of us working with local models and trying to leverage msty's full potential.

@Lucos
Copy link

Lucos commented Nov 5, 2024

I'd appreciate more details about how to use a different embedding model for instance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants