You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are significant gas costs involved with submitting proofs on-chain on L2, which currently means trusting significant amounts of ETH to an EOA.
The optimal solution to this is to reduce the proving costs to a point where securing them with an EOA is acceptable. In the interim, however, it could be valuable for us to make a version of the proveOnChain script that uses a Gnosis Safe for each call to MACI.
I think it's reasonable to make an assumption that the script would require the signers to be running synchronously, perhaps one as the coordinator and some threshold of others running a co-signer script that watched the safe transaction service and only approves the appropriate transactions to the MACI contract.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are significant gas costs involved with submitting proofs on-chain on L2, which currently means trusting significant amounts of ETH to an EOA.
The optimal solution to this is to reduce the proving costs to a point where securing them with an EOA is acceptable. In the interim, however, it could be valuable for us to make a version of the
proveOnChain
script that uses a Gnosis Safe for each call to MACI.I think it's reasonable to make an assumption that the script would require the signers to be running synchronously, perhaps one as the coordinator and some threshold of others running a co-signer script that watched the safe transaction service and only approves the appropriate transactions to the MACI contract.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: