@@ -44,68 +44,68 @@ Bruno Haible says:
44
44
1) ... 7)
45
45
proposed by Gary in the thread starting at
46
46
[PATCH 0/7] contents of topic/libposix for merge to master
47
- in <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/threads.html>
47
+ in <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/threads.html>
48
48
49
49
1) Allow generate header files to coexist without shadowing each other.
50
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00283.html>
50
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00283.html>
51
51
52
52
Discussion:
53
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00289.html>
53
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00289.html>
54
54
55
55
Still missing: dealing with include_next and old compilers, cf.
56
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00269.html>
57
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00285.html>
56
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00269.html>
57
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00285.html>
58
58
59
59
2) Allow using libgnu's file name in module descriptions.
60
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00284.html>
60
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00284.html>
61
61
62
62
Discussion:
63
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00291.html>
64
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00308.html
63
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00291.html>
64
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00308.html
65
65
66
66
3) iconv_open's file file list
67
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00282.html>
67
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00282.html>
68
68
69
69
Discussion:
70
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00290.html>
71
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00307.html>
70
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00290.html>
71
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00307.html>
72
72
libposix needs to install only selected headers, not all of them. Let the
73
73
script look at the 'Include:' section of each module description.
74
74
75
75
4) Module libposix
76
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00280.html>
76
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00280.html>
77
77
78
78
Discussion:
79
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00292.html>
79
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00292.html>
80
80
More discussion needed
81
81
82
82
5) Installable headers
83
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00281.html>
83
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00281.html>
84
84
85
85
Discussion:
86
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00293.html>
86
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00293.html>
87
87
Patch to be rewritten to use nobase_nodist_include_HEADERS,
88
88
also need to add an Automake conditional to distinguish libposix from
89
89
other projects.
90
90
Also see whether the Automake bug can be fixed.
91
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00325.html>
91
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00325.html>
92
92
93
93
6) libposix subdirectory
94
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00277.html>
94
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00277.html>
95
95
96
96
Discussion:
97
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00294.html>
97
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00294.html>
98
98
99
99
7) use git-version-gen for version numbering
100
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00279.html>
100
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00279.html>
101
101
102
102
Discussion:
103
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00297.html>
104
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00303.html>
103
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00297.html>
104
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-10/msg00303.html>
105
105
Patch to be revised.
106
106
107
107
8) Licensing
108
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2010-12/msg00184.html>
108
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2010-12/msg00184.html>
109
109
110
110
Status: A majority of the issues have been handled.
111
111
Obsolete modules (free, memcpy) can be ignored.
@@ -122,6 +122,6 @@ Bruno Haible says:
122
122
utimensat
123
123
124
124
9) Versioning
125
- <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-gnulib/2011-01/msg00163.html>
125
+ <https://lists.gnu.org/r /bug-gnulib/2011-01/msg00163.html>
126
126
127
127
Status: No real plan exists.
0 commit comments