Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open source / free software nature not prominently advertised #444

Open
Chealer opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Open source / free software nature not prominently advertised #444

Chealer opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Chealer
Copy link

Chealer commented Aug 31, 2021

According to What is Podman?, Podman is open source, unlike its competitor Docker. If this is exact, this should be prominent and indicated somehow on Podman's homepage, presumably in its second paragraph (Podman description). This could be as simple as describing Podman as "open source", "free software", "FLOSS" or "FOSS", or mentioning its license.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 1, 2021

Please open a PR, how you would like the description to show.

@Chealer
Copy link
Author

Chealer commented Sep 23, 2021

@rhatdan can you clarify what you mean by "PR"?

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

@Chealer in @rhatdan speak, PR == Pull Request

@Chealer
Copy link
Author

Chealer commented Sep 29, 2021

Thanks @TomSweeneyRedHat

If we are asked to "open" a merge request, we do not have any branch (let alone any change) solving this.

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

@mairin here's one for your design work. I tried to assign it to you, but GitHub wouldn't hear of it.

@mairin
Copy link
Member

mairin commented Dec 6, 2021

@TomSweeneyRedHat Ah I think the trick is if I comment it'll let you assign to me. Let's see if it works!

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

Looks to be the case @mairin , it's all yours now and thanks!

@mairin
Copy link
Member

mairin commented Dec 6, 2021

@Chealer I have some WIP mockups for a new podman.io front page and features pages, and I would love your feedback on whether or not you feel they address highlighting Podman's open source nature.

Here is the first page... I added by the latest stable version number under the main call-to-action buttons in the hero banner that the license is Apache 2.0:
Screenshot from 2021-12-06 14-22-06

On the features page, I have the first sentence of the main description as "Podman is an open source container, pod, and container image management engine."
Screenshot from 2021-12-06 14-22-14

Let me know what you think, if these work or if you have better ideas.

@Chealer
Copy link
Author

Chealer commented Dec 9, 2021

Thank you very much @mairin
I will not comment on the Features page proposal, but the homepage revamp looks quite promising. Considering that some may not know about the Apache license (which is not quite as known as - say - the GPL), I would argue that the proposed homepage mention is fairly subtle. But even adding a subtle advertisement on the homepage surely largely increases prominence, and I for one would consider this issue solved if that proposal is implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants