-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependencies inconsistent with crun
#561
Comments
@giuseppe PTAL. do you know if the crun build instructions can use pkg-config instead of pkgconf on ubuntu? |
I think @phlummox have you tried building crun with |
I haven't tried building crun with |
Just a heads up to anyone who runs into this: I've found that the binary available at In addition to crun, I'm able to use the binary releases of netavark and aardvark-dns as-is. |
Apologies, I haven't had a chance to come back to this. @jklaiho, it's definitely good to hear that the downloadable binaries work well on Ubuntu. But I also think it's reasonable for an open-source project to make it clear how users can build their own binaries, rather than relying on a third party's. cheers. |
crun uses automake/autoconf, so if you have the correct libraries installed it is just a matter of running |
Currently, the installation instructions for building Podman from source say that
pkg-config
is a prerequisite for building Podman on Ubuntu, but they also suggest that it may be necessary to buildcrun
orrunc
from source if the version isn't recent enough (which in my case it wasn't) – and the build instructions forcrun
state thatpkgconf
needs to be installed to build crun.At least on Ubuntu 20.04, it's not possible to have both
pkgconf
andpkg-config
installed at the same time. Ispkgconf
sufficient for building Podman, or do I have to installpkgconf
, buildcrun
, then uninstallpkgconf
and installpkg-config
before I build Podman?I also wondered why there was this inconsistency, when both Podman and
crun
are projects in the containers GitHub organisation – should one or the other be amended so that they're both the same?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: