Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong POD-CIDR when recovery from lost contiv-etcd #1492

Open
LipingMao opened this issue Mar 29, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Wrong POD-CIDR when recovery from lost contiv-etcd #1492

LipingMao opened this issue Mar 29, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@LipingMao
Copy link

LipingMao commented Mar 29, 2019

Sometimes(not every time), if I delete contiv-etcd, the POD-CIDR will overlap.
Here is an example:
ams-dev-limao-work002 and ams-dev-limao-work004 get the same POD CIDR with 10.1.1.0/24.

[root@ams-dev-limao-ctrl001 ~]# contiv-netctl ipam

time="2019-03-29 12:58:26.41316" level=info msg="Connected to Etcd (took 1.28459ms)" endpoints="[127.0.0.1:32379]" loc="etcd/bytes_broker_impl.go(57)" logger=defaultLogger
ID  NODE-NAME              VPP-IP       BVI-IP        POD-CIDR     VPP-2-HOST-CIDR  POD-CLUSTER-CIDR
2   ams-dev-limao-ctrl001  10.253.3.45  192.168.30.2  10.1.2.0/24  172.30.2.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
7   ams-dev-limao-ctrl002  10.253.3.50  192.168.30.7  10.1.7.0/24  172.30.7.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
3   ams-dev-limao-ctrl003  10.253.3.44  192.168.30.3  10.1.3.0/24  172.30.3.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
5   ams-dev-limao-work001  10.253.3.32  192.168.30.5  10.1.5.0/24  172.30.5.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
4   ams-dev-limao-work002  10.253.3.46  192.168.30.4  10.1.1.0/24  172.30.1.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
6   ams-dev-limao-work003  10.253.3.27  192.168.30.6  10.1.6.0/24  172.30.6.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
1   ams-dev-limao-work004  10.253.3.37  192.168.30.1  10.1.1.0/24  172.30.1.0/24    10.1.0.0/16
@rastislavs
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this issue still present in the latest Contiv-VPP version? I wasn't able to reproduce it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants