You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 11, 2019. It is now read-only.
The following links point out the benefits of using the Bancor Formula as the bonding curve implementation over the simpler one we currently use of y = m * x^n.
We may tackle this at a later date. Also, the preferable way to implement this would be being able to upgrade a simple modelled curve to a Bancor curve during live deployment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The following links point out the benefits of using the Bancor Formula as the bonding curve implementation over the simpler one we currently use of
y = m * x^n
.https://blog.relevant.community/bonding-curves-in-depth-intuition-parametrization-d3905a681e0a
https://medium.com/@billyrennekamp/converting-between-bancor-and-bonding-curve-price-formulas-9c11309062f5
We may tackle this at a later date. Also, the preferable way to implement this would be being able to upgrade a simple modelled curve to a Bancor curve during live deployment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: