Using incorrect date format in resource cost history results in cost history data loss #707
Labels
bug
This is a bug (not an enhancement)
important
Not critical but should be addressed
Next release
Propose for February release
When using the Resource cost history's sub start and sub end with the mm/dd/yyyy format, any variation other than mm/dd/yyyy will result in a loss of existing cost history data.
To recreate:
There are a few issues other than the loss of data entry. 1. No error message letting the user know that an improper date format was used. 2. It's not obvious to the user why Coral retained a certain entry versus deleting the others (I've seen it retain first entry, most recent year, highest payment. I can't pinpoint why CORAL selects a specific entry's data to retain).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: