Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow port to be specified to connect to a different chain #2

Closed
andynog opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3
Closed

Allow port to be specified to connect to a different chain #2

andynog opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@andynog
Copy link

andynog commented Nov 20, 2020

Hi guys,

Great work. The tool seems promising. I'd like to request a feature in case you are not working on it yet. In my IBC testing I usually have two chains running and one of the them doesn't have the default port (26657). So it would be nice that when running gex if you could specify the port to listen on and connect to a non-default chain port, something like gex -p [PORT]

Thanks,

Andy.

@toschdev
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that's something we considered already and should be easy to implement. Was waiting for the request and can implement it soon! Thanks for the Issue!

@toschdev
Copy link
Contributor

@andynog Maybe you can tell if this satisfies your needs? #3

@toschdev toschdev added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 23, 2020
@andynog
Copy link
Author

andynog commented Nov 24, 2020

Hi @Tosch110, I've tested and it works. Thanks so much!

@ksbomj
Copy link
Contributor

ksbomj commented May 11, 2022

Hi @toschdev

I created pr that adds more flags for specifying host, transport security, and updated readme. Please let me know if it's fine. We are using this tool a lot for quick debugging and it's good to have them without hacking gex every time when a connection to the remote host is required.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants