Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible integration of pymt & agentpy based model #151

Open
OliPerkins1987 opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Possible integration of pymt & agentpy based model #151

OliPerkins1987 opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@OliPerkins1987
Copy link

Hi there,

I am about to start building a global model that represents human impacts on wildfires. I am deciding which model framework to use as an architecture and am looking at Agentpy and BMI.

For an agent-based model, Agentpy would be an easier framework to use, e.g. by making the implementation of aspects of ABM (different agent classes, agent memory etc) easier. However, I would be very keen to try and integrate the model with the pymt structure - which would at present be the major benefit of using BMI.

Would you be interested in exploring the integration of an Agentpy-based model with the pymt? I thought developing this architecture could be a useful infrastructure to have for human-natural systems modelling. If so, let me know and let's have a chat.

More info on the project: https://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU21/EGU21-9502_presentation.pdf

All best,

Oli Perkins
[email protected]

@mdpiper
Copy link
Member

mdpiper commented Jul 6, 2021

Hi Oli,

I apologize for the delayed response--I was out on vacation.

The ability to couple ABMs and physical models is something that CSDMS is really interested in, and a capability that we lack in pymt. Let's talk more--my email address is [email protected]. Maybe we could schedule a chat over Zoom?

mp

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants