Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SHA-512 and constrained devices #12

Open
csosto-pk opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

SHA-512 and constrained devices #12

csosto-pk opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@csosto-pk
Copy link
Owner

As @dstebila pointed out, one concern that comes to mind about using SHA512 even for "level 1" is that on systems with limited space for code base, they might be willing to have one hash function at the right security level (SHA256) but not an additional one at a higher security level (SHA512). Probably not a very big concern, just thought I'd mention it to see what you think.

@csosto-pk
Copy link
Owner Author

We should ensure we offer other hash options as this progresses to standardization.

@csosto-pk csosto-pk added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant