Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The model setting in the paper #13

Open
zhi-xuan-chen opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

The model setting in the paper #13

zhi-xuan-chen opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@zhi-xuan-chen
Copy link

I would like to ask under what model setting the results in the paper were evaluated. The results I tried to reproduce with the basic setting are slightly worse than those in the paper.

@jingweizhang-xyz
Copy link
Member

Which "basic setting" do you mean and which one is slightly worse than that in the paper?

@zhi-xuan-chen
Copy link
Author

zhi-xuan-chen commented Aug 22, 2024 via email

@jingweizhang-xyz
Copy link
Member

Not sure where the problem is, maybe you can have a try on different alpha and beta as my experiments in Fig.4 to see if this problem occurs in other hyper-parameters also.

@jingweizhang-xyz
Copy link
Member

You can also check my pertained weights in the issue.

@zhi-xuan-chen
Copy link
Author

zhi-xuan-chen commented Aug 22, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants