Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate CI away from TravisCI.org #6781

Closed
TomAugspurger opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Migrate CI away from TravisCI.org #6781

TomAugspurger opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Member

jupyterhub/team-compass#348 for some background. travisci.org is going away in favor of travsci.com. It seems that the queue on .org is quite long.

We should migrate from travisci.org to travisci.com or to GitHub actions. I don't really have a preference, but travisci.com will be less effort I think: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/migrate/open-source-repository-migration

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Yeah this is a good idea.

In conda-forge we went about this ourselves. This is was in part because the queue time on .org was getting to be too painful and with so many repos we couldn't really depend on when Travis CI would migrate some subset of repos over.

With Zarr, we just did this by hand and it wasn't too difficult. Though there are only a couple repos to consider.

Took a look to see what the situation is here. It seems we have some mix of things on .org and some on .com. Not sure if this is because some were migrated or newer repos just showed up on the newer service or what. Anyways figured that was worth being aware of.

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Huh this is new? Maybe it just requires going through and clicking the button for each of these? If we decide to do that, maybe before the weekend to minimize disruption would be good (though could see arguments for other dates/times as well).

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 7 59 22 PM

@jsignell
Copy link
Member

jsignell commented Nov 2, 2020

Closing this in favor of #6787 which was discussed in dask/community#107

@jsignell jsignell closed this as completed Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants