From 160798cf1bbc89ade4670b0a008c9f94e7a972a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoine R Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:10:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] feat: Updated about EN --- messages/en/pages/about.json | 67 +++++++++++++----------- messages/fr/pages/about.json | 2 +- src/app/[locale]/about/about.tsx | 38 ++++++++------ src/app/[locale]/dashboard/dashboard.tsx | 4 +- 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/messages/en/pages/about.json b/messages/en/pages/about.json index 80df958b..58982802 100644 --- a/messages/en/pages/about.json +++ b/messages/en/pages/about.json @@ -10,102 +10,109 @@ }, "who": { "title": "Who we are?", - "content": "

PinkBombs is the result of a collaboration between two non-profit organizations, Seastemik and DataforGood.

Seastemik is an NGO founded in 2023 by a collective of optimists concerned about the state of the oceans, the primary source of life on Earth. By raising awareness among civil society and engaging the responsibility of intermediary actors (large-scale retail and collective catering) and the State, our mission is to drive a transition towards a healthy, accessible, and sustainable food system that respects the oceans, human societies, and animals.

Data For Good is a French NGO whose aim is to help projects of general interest to develop. Thanks to a community of over 4,000 tech-savvy volunteers, a dozen projects a year are supported and developed for over 3 months.

" + "content": "

PinkBombs is the result of a collaboration between two non-profit organizations, Seastemik and DataforGood.

Seastemik is an NGO founded in 2023 by a collective of optimists concerned about the state of the oceans, the primary source of life on Earth. By raising awareness among civil society and engaging the responsibility of intermediary actors (large-scale retail and collective catering) and the State, our mission is to drive a transition towards a healthy, accessible, and sustainable food system that respects the oceans, human societies, and animals.

Data For Good is a French NGO whose aim is to help projects of general interest to develop. Thanks to a community of over 4000 tech-savvy volunteers, a dozen projects a year are supported and developed for over 3 months.

" }, "methods": { "title": "Approach & methodologies", "content": "

PinkBombs was created by a consortium of non-profit organizations that analyze and transform public data into accessible tools to raise awareness of the key levers for halting the ocean emergency.

Our approach is based on three pillars:

  1. Open source: the code is available here.
  2. Collaborative: Reach out to contribute or suggest improvements.
  3. Dynamic: Our database is regularly updated to incorporate new insights and to enhance its accuracy.

Our approach followed three steps:

  1. Prioritized topics: The aim of the website being to offer a compilation of the most striking information on the subject, the organization set out to prioritize the subjects to be tackled. Then each volunteer chose the subjects they wanted to tackle alone or in groups.
  2. In-depth research: Research is carried out on the internet and by contacting experts, taking care to use only scientific sources and not to use information from unreliable sources or without sourced or scientific support.
  3. Peer reviewed data: In the interest of data quality, all information is double-checked by another volunteer or member of the Seastemik organization (source and formulation).
" }, "sources": "Sources & Methodology", + "statement": { + "title": " ", + "content": "

Data presented on the Dashboard is focused on Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) unless otherwise stated.

" + }, "macro": { "title": "Macro Trends", - "content": "

Data presented on the Dashboard is focused on Atlantic Salmon species (Salmo salar) unless otherwise stated.

", "calculator": { "title": "Impacts of the salmon industry - counter", - "content": "

This counter is a per-second breakdown of the following major annual indicators for the salmon industry:

" + "content": "

This counter is a per-second breakdown of the following major annual indicators for the salmon industry:

" }, "salmon-collapse": { "title": "Wild salmon collapse", - "content": "

Data on wild salmon catch in Atlantic waters is available on the website of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (NASCO).

" + "content": "

Atlantic salmon is on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Data on wild salmon catch in Atlantic waters is available on the website of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (NASCO).

" }, "hyper-growth": { - "title": "Hyper-growth of salmon farming", - "content": "

Data on the production of farmed salmon is available on the website of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The graphs “Hyper-growth in salmon farming”, “Top 10 countries producing salmon”, and “Evolution of salmon farming by country” are a direct visual representation of these two data sources once filtered for Salmo Salar.

To calculate the number of salmons produced or convert the number of tonnes into the number of salmons, we used the average weight of a salmon at the end of its growth in industrial farming: 5kg (Sources: Knockaert C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount).

" + "title": "The industry of Atlantic Salmon", + "content": "

Data on farmed salmon production is available on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations website (Source: FAO). The graphs 'Farmed salmon production' (Story page), 'Farmed salmon production by country,' 'Top 10 salmon producing countries by tonnes (2021),' and 'Evolution of salmon farming by country' (Dashboard page) are a direct visual representation of this data source once filtered for Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon).

To calculate the number of salmons produced or convert the number of tonnes into the number of salmons, we used the average weight of a salmon at the end of its growth in industrial farming: 5 kg (Sources: Knockaert C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount).

In order to provide a comparison between volumes of Atlantic salmon fishing and aquaculture, we used the maximum volume of Atlantic salmon caught in one year which is 25,293 tonnes in 1967 (Source: NASCO, see Section Wild atlantic salmon collapse). The production of farmed salmon was 2.9 million tonnes in 2021 (Source: FAO), which is 115 times greater than the largest amount of salmon ever caught in a single year.

" }, "consumption": { - "title": "Salmon consumption in the world", - "content": "

The consumption of salmon by countries is estimated based on data on capture, aquaculture, and exchange from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The following files are used to compile the balances:

All salmon species are considered in this analysis. Indeed, it is sometimes difficult to identify the species of salmon in traded products (salmon fillet, salmonids, etc.), making it complex to differentiate products from Atlantic salmon, sockeye, chinook, etc. The year 2019, the last pre-COVID year, is used as a reference. As soon as the FAO releases trading data for the year 2022, this graph can be updated.

The indicator used to estimate the consumption of salmon for each country is apparent consumption, estimated as the difference between incoming flows (capture + farming + imports) and outgoing flows (exports + re-exports).

The conversion factor (CF) describes the ratio between the weight of the product and the weight of fresh salmon needed to produce it. Indeed, capture and aquaculture data are provided in live weight (tonnes live weight - TLW), while exchange data are provided in product weight (tonnes product weight - TPW). Product processing can involve changes in product weight, which must be taken into account for balance estimation. Thus, a product with a CF equal to 2 means that 2 kilograms of fresh salmon are needed to produce 1 kilogram of the product.

To compare produced, imported, and exported quantities, the following conversion table was considered, inspired by conversion tables proposed by the FAO:

  • No project yet: he company has announced ambitions of production but no specific location for the projects could be identified based on the latest information available online. These are included in the dataset but not on the map.

    • The dataset excludes land-based farms that have been stopped (eg. destroyed after a fire) or projects abandoned.

    Locations are approximate, as the information available on the location of land-based projects/farms online is generally at the level of towns/villages. This information was matched to the dataset of Geonames - All Cities with a population > 1000 to obtain Latitude / Longitude coordinates. For projects in villages smaller than 1000 inhabitants or with ambiguous names, we used Google maps to determine the coordinates. For a small number of projects, only the region could be identified.

    Estimation of electricity consumption and carbon footprint

    RAS technology (Recycled Aquaculture Systems) in fully enclosed tanks requires large amounts of freshwater and is very energy-intensive, as it aims to recreate very precisely the natural conditions found in the sea. In order to estimate the long-term electricity consumption of individual land-based projects, the production capacity of the farm in tonnes of salmon per year was multiplied by the electricity usage per weight of salmon produced. Given the level of uncertainty related to the precise implementation of RAS technology, we opted for a range of values based on scientific publications:

    This range encompasses the electricity consumption per weight produced for farms currently in operation, such as Atlantic Sapphire (Annual report, 2022).

    The annual carbon footprint of individual farms was estimated based on four components:

    Potential limitations to our methodology
    1. Land-based projects in the dataset may be missing or out-of-date. If investment was announced but fell through, the project might have been abandoned. The location may be inaccurate, if a different construction site has been identified but not announced. We report the year of the latest information identified for full transparency.
    2. The production capacity captured may not be consistent from farm to farm. Depending on the information available, it may reflect what the company has received permission to produce or what the company’s long-term plans are.
    3. The electricity consumption per tonnes of salmon produced is based on RAS technology and should represent an average. A small number of projects use SIFT technology with a likely higher electricity consumption, and Hybrid RAS/FTS technology with a likely lower electricity consumption.
    4. The carbon footprint for land-based farms may be overestimated or underestimated on a case by case basis depending on the specific arrangements that the company has locally to increase sustainability and/or the use of local renewable energy (eg. geothermal).
    " }, "future-land-keys": { - "title": "Land-based farms - top figures", - "content": "

    The indicators related to the RAS project map are based on the following assumptions:

    " + "title": "Land-based salmon farms - top figures", + "content": "

    The indicators related to the RAS project map are based on the following assumptions:

    " } }, "biodiversity": { "title": "Biodiversity", "deforestation": { "title": "Deforestation", - "content": "

    Tracing the production chain of salmon back to its impact on deforestation is not an easy task. Here, we will focus solely on the land required for salmon production in Norway, particularly for a key plant-based component of their diet: Brazilian Soy Protein Concentrate (SPC). We will not provide exact figures on legal deforestation linked to the Norwegian salmon industry. Indeed, since 2006, the Soy Moratorium is supposed to protect the Amazon from legal deforestation for soybean cultivation. Nevertheless, legal deforestation has shifted to other less protected regions of Brazil, such as the Cerrado, and intensive soybean production continues in areas of the Amazon that were deforested before 2008.

    We relied on the 2017 report From Brazilian farms to Norwegian tablesby Framtiden i våre hender (FIVH) and Rainforest Foundation Norway (RFN) to trace the production chain between Brazilian soy and Norwegian salmon. This report indicates that in 2015, 3 tonnes of soybeans were cultivated per hectare on average, and it takes 0.57 kg of soybeans to produce 1 kg of SPC. It also notes that Norwegian authorities wish the aquaculture industry to reach five times its current size by 2050.

    To obtain the volumes for 2020, we used a second report, Utilization of feed resources in the production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway: An update for 2020which states that 413,611 tonnes of SPC were imported to Norway in 2020 for farmed salmon feed, with 368,497 tonnes coming from Brazil.

    Using these figures and accounting for the amount of salmon produced by Norway in 2020 (according to the FAO), we deduce that the area required for soybean cultivation in Brazil to feed Norwegian salmon in 2020 is 2,154 km² (more than 20 times the area of Paris. This area could reach approximately 11,000 km² by 2050, comparable to the legal deforestation of the Amazon in 2022, which was11,570 km².

    " + "content": "

    Tracing the production chain of salmon back to its impact on deforestation is not an easy task. Here, we will focus solely on the land required for salmon production in Norway, particularly for a key plant-based component of their diet: Brazilian Soy Protein Concentrate (SPC). We will not provide exact figures on legal deforestation linked to the Norwegian salmon industry. Indeed, since 2006, the Soy Moratorium is supposed to protect the Amazon from legal deforestation for soybean cultivation. Nevertheless, legal deforestation has shifted to other less protected regions of Brazil, such as the Cerrado, and intensive soybean production continues in areas of the Amazon that were deforested before 2008.

    We relied on the 2017 report From Brazilian farms to Norwegian tables by Framtiden i våre hender (FIVH) and Rainforest Foundation Norway (RFN) to trace the production chain between Brazilian soy and Norwegian salmon. This report indicates that in 2015, 3 tonnes of soybeans were cultivated per hectare on average, and it takes 0.57 kg of soybeans to produce 1 kg of SPC. It also notes that Norwegian authorities wish the aquaculture industry to reach five times its current size by 2050.

    To obtain the volumes for 2020, we used a second report, Utilization of feed resources in the production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway: An update for 2020 which states that 413,611 tonnes of SPC were imported to Norway in 2020 for farmed salmon feed, with 368,497 tonnes coming from Brazil.

    Using these figures and accounting for the amount of salmon produced by Norway in 2020 (according to the FAO), we deduce that the area required for soybean cultivation in Brazil to feed Norwegian salmon in 2020 is 2,154 km2 (more than 20 times the area of Paris). This area could reach approximately 11,000 km2 by 2050, comparable to the legal deforestation of the Amazon in 2022, which was11,570 km2.

    " }, "escapes": { "title": "Escapes", - "content": "

    The data on salmon escapes come from the annual reports of the producers (Source: integrated reports and/or sustainability reports, see the Producers section). The data collected for each producer are compiled over all the reported years and then compared.

    The escape rate corresponds to the ratio between the number of escaped fish and the number of fish produced over the considered period. An average weight of salmon at harvest is set at 5 kg (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount).

    " + "content": "

    The data on salmon escapes come from the annual reports of the producers (Source: integrated reports and/or sustainability reports (en, es, dk), see the Producers section). No data was found for Cooke. The data collected for each producer are compiled over all the reported years and then compared.

    The escape rate corresponds to the ratio between the number of escaped fish and the number of fish produced over the considered period. An average weight of salmon at harvest is estimated at 5 kg (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount).

    " } }, "human-health": { "title": "Human health", "antibiotic": { "title": "Consumption of antibiotics", - "content": "

    Data on the use of antibiotics in the salmon farming industry is difficult to obtain. In Chile, the National Fisheries and Aquaculture Service (Sernapesca) published a report in 2021 on the Use of antimicrobials in national salmoniculture. We use the data on the amount of antimicrobials for 2021 (463 tonnes), reported against the harvested biomass (0.99 millions of tonnes), with a ratio of 0.047%. The large majority of antimicrobials are applied to aquaculture in sea water (98.7%) and to Salmon species (97.9%). Antimicrobials include antibiotics, as well as antifungal and antiseptic medicine, however the report shows that the substance the most commonly used in sea water aquaculture is Florenicol (97.1%), an antibiotic commonly used in veterinary medicine.

    To produce the infographic image, we converted the amount of antibiotics administered to salmon fish produced in 2021 to a human, using the average weight of a French person (women and men combined - 74.1kg (Source). The dose of antibiotics this would represent for a human (35g) is equivalent to 139 tablets of antibiotics (1 tablet of 250mg of typical antibiotics for human consumption).

    " + "content": "

    Data on the use of antibiotics in the salmon farming industry is difficult to obtain. In Chile, the National Fisheries and Aquaculture Service (Sernapesca) published a report in 2021 on the Use of antimicrobials in national salmoniculture (es). We use the data on the amount of antimicrobials for 2021 (463 tonnes), reported against the harvested biomass (0.99 millions of tonnes), with a ratio of 0.047%. The large majority of antimicrobials are applied to aquaculture in sea water (98.7%) and to Salmon species (97.9%). Antimicrobials include antibiotics, as well as antifungal and antiseptic medicine, however the report shows that the substance the most commonly used in sea water aquaculture is Florenicol (97.1%), an antibiotic commonly used in veterinary medicine.

    To produce the visualisation, we converted the amount of antibiotics administered to salmon fish produced in 2021 to a human, using the average weight of a French person (women and men combined - 74.1kg (Source: Ligue contre l'obésité (fr)). The dose of antibiotics this would represent for a human (35 g) is equivalent to 139 tablets of antibiotics (1 tablet of 250mg of typical antibiotics for human consumption).

    " }, "microplastics": { "title": "Microplastics (MPs)", - "content": "

    To estimate how many MPs are eaten per French person per year, we started by leveraging the existing research to calculate how many MPs can be found in one salmon:

    We assumed that the wild/farmed ratio was 93% for the salmon eaten by French people (WWF study) - taking a different value has a limited impact on the outcome, as the number of MPs which can be found in salmon doesn’t change significantly between the two categories).

    Considering that one salmon weighs 5kg on average (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount), we find that one salmon contains 618 MPs.

    A French person eats 4.4kgs of salmon per year (France Agrimer). This represents 544 MPs per year.

    As a French person eats 97,500 MPs per year (source), we find that 0.6% comes from eating fishes.

    " + "content": "

    For the definition of Microplastics (MP), the most commonly advocated threshold is <5 mm (EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Commission Decision, 2017). To estimate how many MPs are eaten per French person per year, we started by leveraging the existing research to calculate how many MPs can be found in one salmon:

    We assumed that the wild/farmed ratio was 93% for the salmon eaten by French people (WWF study (fr)) - taking a different value has a limited impact on the outcome, as the number of MPs which can be found in salmon doesn’t change significantly between the two categories.

    Considering that one salmon weighs 5kg on average (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount), we find that one salmon contains 618 MPs.

    A French person eats 4.4kgs of salmon per year (France Agrimer (fr)). This represents 544 MPs per year.

    As a French person eats 97,500 MPs per year (Cox et al. 2019), we find that 0.6% comes from eating fishes.

    " } }, "animal-welfare": { "title": "Animal welfare", "density": { - "title": "Density / stress in land-based farms", - "content": "

    To represent the density of salmon in the farming industry, we use the following values:

    Assuming that a bath tube contains 200 liters of water (there’s no clear data on this, but this is an approximate value that we can assume by comparing different bath tubes online), and assuming that a salmon weighs 5kg (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount), we find that the density in marine farms is equivalent to putting 0.8 salmon in a bath tub, and 2.6 salmons for land-based farms.

    " + "title": "Density / stress in land-based salmon farms", + "content": "

    To represent the density of salmon in the farming industry, we use the following values:

    Assuming that a bathtub contains 200 liters of water (there’s no clear data on this, but this is an approximate value that we can assume by comparing different bathtubs online), and assuming that a salmon weighs 5kg (Sources: Knockaert, C. 2006, Mood et al. 2023, Scottish fish farm production survey 2020, Fishcount), we find that the density in marine farms is equivalent to putting 0.8 salmon in a bathtub, and 4 salmons for land-based farms.

    " }, "mortality": { "title": "Mortality rates", - "content": "

    The data on salmon mortality rates come from the annual reports of the producers (Source: integrated reports and/or sustainability reports, see the Producers section). The mortality rates collected for each producer are detailed year by year, and if possible, country by country if the data are available.

    The mortality rates correspond to the mortality at sea during the maturation phase of the salmon. The mortality rates during the pre-smolt growth phase.

    " + "content": "

    The data on salmon mortality rates come from the annual reports of the producers (Source: integrated reports and/or sustainability reports (en, es, dk), see the Producers section). Mortality rates collected for each producer are detailed year by year, and if possible, country by country if the data are available. Data is not available for all producers for all years (2011 - 2022). Note: these figures only account for mortality at sea during the salmon maturation phase. Mortality observed in freshwater during the pre-smolt growth phase is close to 30% (Source: Annual reports Multi X (en, es)).

    For comparison, intensive farming shows mortality rates around 3% for cattle (Source: VetAgro Sup (fr)), 20% for pigs (Source: IFIP (fr)), and 4% for chickens (Source: ATAVI (fr)).

    " } }, "climate": { - "title": "Climat", + "title": "Climate", "emissions": { "title": "CO2 emissions", - "content": "

    The quantity of greenhouse gas emissions from salmon farming, as well as their distribution between scopes 1, 2, and 3, are derived from the 2021 annual reports of 9 of the largest producers, which represent about 50% of the world's production (Source:integrated reports and/or sustainability reports, see the Producers section). The scope 2 emissions considered are those estimated according to the \"location-based\" calculation methodology.

    These emissions are then extrapolated to the entire global salmon production, assuming homogeneity in practices and feed sources among the remaining producers. The spreadsheet used to arrive at our estimate of emissions from salmon farming is available here.

    " + "content": "

    The quantity of greenhouse gas emissions from salmon farming, as well as their distribution between scopes 1, 2, and 3, are derived from the 2021 annual reports of 9 of the largest producers, which represent about 50% of the world's production (Source:integrated reports and/or sustainability reports (en, es, dk), see the Producers section). The scope 2 emissions considered are those estimated according to the \"location-based\" calculation methodology.

    These emissions are then extrapolated to the entire global salmon production, considering a production of 2.9 million tonnes of salmon (Source: FAO), assuming homogeneity in practices and feed sources among the remaining producers.

    The detailed emissions of the 9 largest salmon producers are accessible here.

    For comparison, we use the total CO2 emissions of Croatia, estimated at 17.2 million tons in 2022 (Source: EDGAR), as well as the 2050 target of 2 tonnes per person per year to avoid exceeding +2°C of global warming (Source: The Nature Conservancy).

    " } }, "social": { "title": "Social", "resources": { "title": "Resource Diversion and Food Injustice", - "content": "

    To estimate the proportion of fish from mill fishing used to feed farmed salmon, we used the following sources:

    Using the FIFO ratio, we estimate the quantity of fish caught to feed farmed salmon at 2.72 million tonnes, which represents 3% of global fisheries (2020). As more recent figures were not available, we calculated the volume of global fish production destined for different sectors. Among the 20 million tonnes (~23%) not intended for human consumption, aquaculture accounts for 8.5 million tonnes.

    The figures on fishing in West Africa dedicated to Norwegian salmon farming are taken from the report from Feedback (Source: Blue Empire: How the Norwegian salmon industry extracts nutrition and undermines livelihoods in West Africa, 2024).

    " + "content": "

    To estimate the proportion of fish from mill fishing used to feed farmed salmon, we used the following sources:

    Using the conversion factors presented above, we estimate the quantity of fish caught to feed farmed salmon at 3.66 million tonnes, which represents 4% of global fisheries (2020). As more recent figures were not available, we calculated the volume of global fish production destined for different sectors. Among the 20 million tonnes (~23%) not intended for human consumption, aquaculture (8.55 million tons) represents 9.5% of global fishing production.

    The figures on fishing in West Africa dedicated to Norwegian salmon farming are taken from the report from Feedback (Source: Blue Empire: How the Norwegian salmon industry extracts nutrition and undermines livelihoods in West Africa, 2024).

    " } + }, + "alternatives": { + "title": "Food choices and their impact", + "content": "

    The food choices table provides a comparison of 8 food choices (including salmon) based on 6 criteria. Some of these criteria rely on quantitative data, while others rely on qualitative data. The color range represents graduated degrees of impact, from dark green (very low impact) to dark red (excessively high impact).

    For a detailed description of the methodology and sources used to generate this table, download the PDF document. To better visualize the table, < a href=\"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dataforgoodfr/12_pinkbombs/main/download/Table_food_choices_simplified_en.pdf\">download the simplified version (PDF) or download the detailed version (PDF).

    The methodology includes an analysis on omega-3s (benefits, national nutritional balance, financial cost on household consumption basket).

    " } } } diff --git a/messages/fr/pages/about.json b/messages/fr/pages/about.json index 6b98dcb1..71fcdb54 100644 --- a/messages/fr/pages/about.json +++ b/messages/fr/pages/about.json @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ "title": "Producteurs", "top-comp": { "title": "Principaux producteurs de saumons en cages marines", - "content": "
    Mowi Annual Salmon Farming Industry Handbook

    Les données sur la production des 10 plus grands producteurs de saumons d'élevage sont directement tirées du rapport annuel de Mowi 2023 (anglais, pdf) sans transformation de notre part.

    Les rapports issus des producteurs

    Un grand nombre d’indicateurs sont tirés des rapports intégrés et rapports de durabilité publiés par les producteurs de saumon. La grande majorité d’entre eux publie des informations sur leurs performances en matière de durabilité et leur impact environnemental au sein de rapports annuels normés. Ces rapports sont amenés à évoluer dans les années à venir, du fait de normes plus exigeantes. Les rapports de durabilité trouvés et utilisés par le projet PinkBombs peuvent être retrouvés dans ce dossier (anglais). À noter qu’aucun rapport n’a pu être trouvé pour l’entreprise Cooke, pourtant 8ème plus gros producteur mondial.

    " + "content": "
    Mowi Annual Salmon Farming Industry Handbook

    Les données sur la production des 10 plus grands producteurs de saumons d'élevage sont directement tirées du rapport annuel de Mowi 2023 (anglais, pdf) sans transformation de notre part.

    Les rapports issus des producteurs

    Un grand nombre d’indicateurs sont tirés des rapports intégrés et rapports de durabilité publiés par les producteurs de saumon. La grande majorité d’entre eux publie des informations sur leurs performances en matière de durabilité et leur impact environnemental au sein de rapports annuels normés. Ces rapports sont amenés à évoluer dans les années à venir, du fait de normes plus exigeantes. Les rapports de durabilité trouvés et utilisés par le projet PinkBombs peuvent être retrouvés dans ce dossier (anglais). À noter qu’aucun rapport n’a pu être trouvé pour l’entreprise Cooke, pourtant 8ème plus gros producteur mondial.

    " }, "top-land": { "title": "Les fermes-usines de saumons à terre - la carte", diff --git a/src/app/[locale]/about/about.tsx b/src/app/[locale]/about/about.tsx index 45ca0a87..8ec6d780 100644 --- a/src/app/[locale]/about/about.tsx +++ b/src/app/[locale]/about/about.tsx @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ const About = () => { - + ); }; @@ -65,10 +65,11 @@ const MacroSection = () => { return ( <> + { ); }; -const AlternativesSection = () => { - const t = useTranslations("about"); - - return ( - - ); -}; - const CompaniesSection = () => { const t = useTranslations("about"); @@ -127,6 +116,11 @@ const CompaniesSection = () => { subtitle={t("companies.future-land-based.title")} content={t.raw("companies.future-land-based.content")} /> + { ); }; + +const AlternativesSection = () => { + const t = useTranslations("about"); + + return ( + + ); +}; diff --git a/src/app/[locale]/dashboard/dashboard.tsx b/src/app/[locale]/dashboard/dashboard.tsx index 01af5546..9fd20415 100644 --- a/src/app/[locale]/dashboard/dashboard.tsx +++ b/src/app/[locale]/dashboard/dashboard.tsx @@ -158,7 +158,9 @@ const Dashboard = () => { />
    - + From 747c0ee91f53a1d48f8d46db13f23335c8e9b182 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gmguarino Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:12:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fix: a tag --- messages/en/pages/about.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/messages/en/pages/about.json b/messages/en/pages/about.json index 58982802..1fa384cf 100644 --- a/messages/en/pages/about.json +++ b/messages/en/pages/about.json @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ }, "alternatives": { "title": "Food choices and their impact", - "content": "

    The food choices table provides a comparison of 8 food choices (including salmon) based on 6 criteria. Some of these criteria rely on quantitative data, while others rely on qualitative data. The color range represents graduated degrees of impact, from dark green (very low impact) to dark red (excessively high impact).

    For a detailed description of the methodology and sources used to generate this table, download the PDF document. To better visualize the table, < a href=\"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dataforgoodfr/12_pinkbombs/main/download/Table_food_choices_simplified_en.pdf\">download the simplified version (PDF) or download the detailed version (PDF).

    The methodology includes an analysis on omega-3s (benefits, national nutritional balance, financial cost on household consumption basket).

    " + "content": "

    The food choices table provides a comparison of 8 food choices (including salmon) based on 6 criteria. Some of these criteria rely on quantitative data, while others rely on qualitative data. The color range represents graduated degrees of impact, from dark green (very low impact) to dark red (excessively high impact).

    For a detailed description of the methodology and sources used to generate this table, download the PDF document. To better visualize the table, download the simplified version (PDF) or download the detailed version (PDF).

    The methodology includes an analysis on omega-3s (benefits, national nutritional balance, financial cost on household consumption basket).

    " } } }