You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From goodtabes@3 (now early alpha) it will have a function like system.create_check('baseline/integrity/etc') returning a check object with check.validate_headers/row/table available. The amount of checks have been drastically reduces (only 2 core checks and 6 advanced).
So we will be able to integrate it into the validate processor like (maybe adding core checks baseline/integrity by default):
As an output, I think we just can add the errors list to a resource descriptor with a list of found errors.
Initially dataflows-goodtables integration is a @cschloer's idea but, for now, I don't see how we can friend them due to their streaming-nature without going to lower-level (the level of the individual check).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yea. I think so. Now this atomic checks architecture works with Frictionless so we can apply checks on streams (as a dataflows processor without consuming a stream separately)
Overview
From
goodtabes@3
(now early alpha) it will have a function likesystem.create_check('baseline/integrity/etc')
returning a check object withcheck.validate_headers/row/table
available. The amount of checks have been drastically reduces (only 2 core checks and 6 advanced).So we will be able to integrate it into the
validate
processor like (maybe adding core checks baseline/integrity by default):As an output, I think we just can add the
errors
list to a resource descriptor with a list of found errors.Initially
dataflows-goodtables
integration is a @cschloer's idea but, for now, I don't see how we can friend them due to their streaming-nature without going to lower-level (the level of the individual check).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: