Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

297 restructure package #299

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

297 restructure package #299

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

r-leyshon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #297

Motivation and Context

Removes GTFS logic & restructures package & dependencies. Updates workflows.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How Has This Been Tested?

Test configuration details:

  • OS: macos
  • Python version: 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 (CI matrix.python-version)
  • Java version: openjdk 11.0.19 2023-04-18 LTS
  • Python management system: pip, conda env

Advice for reviewer

Suggest building package with python 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 & checking newport TP matrix is equal. Would be a good idea to include this as an e2e test.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the intended structure of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Additional comments

@r-leyshon r-leyshon added enhancement New feature or request technical debt A better way is available. Fix later approach has been adopted. labels Jul 9, 2024
@r-leyshon r-leyshon added this to the Version 1 Release milestone Jul 9, 2024
@r-leyshon r-leyshon requested a review from ethan-moss July 9, 2024 13:05
@r-leyshon r-leyshon linked an issue Jul 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
7 tasks
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (cef299b) to head (6fbf874).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #299       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.13%   0.00%   -98.14%     
==========================================
  Files          21      11       -10     
  Lines        1983     868     -1115     
==========================================
- Hits         1946       0     -1946     
- Misses         37     868      +831     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 0.00% <ø> (-98.14%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@r-leyshon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ethan-moss I have checked outputs are the same when built with 3.9, 3.10 & 3.11 python environments. Everything passes on macos. GitHub won't let me attach the renderred html files here, so I'll share on Slack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request technical debt A better way is available. Fix later approach has been adopted.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

restructure package
2 participants