You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the identifier related schemas include "format": "uri" while the original intention was to support both strings (for accession numbers that are not URIs) and URIs when available.
The examples we have at https://github.com/datatagsuite/examples demonstrate this, as we supported strings as identifiers in addition to URIs, but the problem was that the validator wasn't catching the "format": "uri"restriction.
Currently, the identifier related schemas include
"format": "uri"
while the original intention was to support both strings (for accession numbers that are not URIs) and URIs when available.The examples we have at https://github.com/datatagsuite/examples demonstrate this, as we supported strings as identifiers in addition to URIs, but the problem was that the validator wasn't catching the
"format": "uri"
restriction.This issue was originated here: dcppc/crosscut-metadata#8 by @jonathancrabtree
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: