ignoring_repeated_field_ordering can't always be combined with ignoring_field_paths

[mdepinet]

ignoring_repeated_field_ordering works by sorting values based on their string representation. In order to work with ignoring_field_paths, it would need to omit ignored fields from the string representation before ordering.

That said, currently a mismatch can shift the expected list leading to more apparent diffs than real diffs, so maybe it makes more sense to iteratively compare each value from actual to each value in expected that hasn't already been matched.

[mdepinet]

I opened a PR to fix this if you have time to review: #13

[mdepinet]

For anyone who comes across this in the future, I've created a new repo here: https://github.com/mdepinet/hamcrest-proto

Contributions welcome!