You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We decided that we would allow iteration of entities, such that a an expression can have a relationship to another expression - expressionA expresses expressionB. (It may make more sense to use: expressionOf) The same is true of manifestation, one manifestation being a manifestation of the other. But we weren't sure how you could have an item of an item, especially with digital copies (#21). Also, we have no predicate for a work that is a work of another work.
At April 19 meeting we decided that we would NOT define predicates for the entity/entity relationships but would include in the documentation that the possibility is assumed.
We decided that we would allow iteration of entities, such that a an expression can have a relationship to another expression - expressionA expresses expressionB. (It may make more sense to use: expressionOf) The same is true of manifestation, one manifestation being a manifestation of the other. But we weren't sure how you could have an item of an item, especially with digital copies (#21). Also, we have no predicate for a work that is a work of another work.
See the opening readme.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: