Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Diagramming hypothetical subclasses and sub-properties from "recorded music" to openWEMI in Primer #67

Open
dlovins opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@dlovins
Copy link

dlovins commented Sep 19, 2023

@kcoyle : at last week's meeting I volunteered to re-create the diagram in LucidChart from the end of the Primer to allow for further modification. I've generated a few images in my LucidChart account, the first meant to be the same as what's in the Primer, and the second ultimately to include extensions. The thing is that I can't recall exactly what those extensions would be. I think the idea was to include "notated music" (in addition to "recorded music"). However, an Endeavor like the "Let it Be" studio recording wouldn't have a score, right? It might have a transcription, though -- something like this, but corresponding to the studio recording. If that's the case -- and looking at guidelines from Yale library -- the expression, manifestation and items would be straightforward print-type entities. Sorry I'm not able to take this further without help.

@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator

kcoyle commented Sep 19, 2023

Thanks, @dlovins these look great. We could show a transcription as an extension. I also found that the Internet Archive has manuscripts of some songs (not this one), so we could make up an extension (doesn't have to be real) for such an artifact. And there is a [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_It_Be_(Beatles_song) article about the song that we could link to as a related work, with the relation being something like "subject of". It also has some images that we could use.

I don't think I can modify the lucid chart images. Is there a way to make them open?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants